The Law Office of Jason Ingber continues to advocate for consumers in automotive defect cases, this time challenging one of the nation’s largest vehicle manufacturers over ongoing issues with reliability, warranty performance, and discovery compliance in litigation involving a 2017 SUV.
Defective Vehicle Allegations and Safety Concerns
The case centers on repeated mechanical problems, including oil leaks, brake failures, suspension issues, and structural defects, which significantly compromised the vehicle’s safety and performance. Despite multiple repair attempts under warranty, the manufacturer allegedly failed to correct the defects or offer a timely repurchase under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, also known as the Lemon Law.
The lawsuit asserts that the company knew about recurring problems affecting similar models but continued to market the vehicle as durable, dependable, and capable under demanding conditions. Consumers allege they relied on these representations when purchasing their vehicles, only to experience persistent mechanical breakdowns shortly afterward.
Discovery Disputes and Delay Tactics
The manufacturer has been accused of obstructing the discovery process by objecting to nearly every category of document requests and deposition topics. In its responses, the company labeled consumer safety concerns as “overly broad” and “burdensome,” while refusing to produce key internal communications or technical bulletins related to known defects.
When the plaintiff noticed a deposition of the company’s person most knowledgeable about the defects, the defense refused to attend on the scheduled date and sought to delay the process further, claiming scheduling conflicts. The firm’s ongoing efforts aim to ensure that the automaker fully complies with discovery obligations and provides transparency regarding its vehicle design, defect management, and warranty practices.
Settlement Offer Reflects Broader Industry Trend
Shortly after discovery disputes began, the manufacturer issued a CCP §998 Offer to Compromise, offering a small settlement amount in exchange for a dismissal of the case with prejudice. The offer, which included attorney’s fees and costs, is part of a broader trend in which automakers attempt to resolve defect claims quietly rather than face trial and public scrutiny.
The Law Office of Jason Ingber regularly advises clients to evaluate such offers carefully, ensuring that consumers do not accept settlements that undervalue the true financial and safety impact of defective vehicles.
Protecting Consumer Rights Across California
California’s Lemon Law provides powerful protections for consumers who purchase or lease defective vehicles that manufacturers fail to repair within a reasonable number of attempts. Our firm has successfully represented clients against major automakers, holding them accountable for violations of warranty law and unfair business practices.
If your vehicle has suffered from repeated mechanical problems, or if a manufacturer has failed to repair or repurchase your car as required by law, you may have the right to pursue compensation.
Contact The Law Office of Jason Ingber
The Law Office of Jason Ingber is committed to protecting California consumers from defective vehicles, breach of warranty, and corporate misconduct.
If you have experienced repeated vehicle issues or believe your manufacturer has acted unfairly, contact us today for a free consultation. Our attorneys will review your case, explain your legal options, and fight for the justice you deserve.
We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you do not pay unless we recover compensation for you.